Verified by Reputable Health
30-day wearable-powered study • 25 participants
We evaluated the LyfeFuel Essentials Nutritional Shake on sleep, activity, and recovery.
Essentials Nutritional Shake shows measurable improvements in sleep duration and heart-based recovery markers.
Top improvement metrics across the cohort (baseline → intervention).
+7.74%
Raw change: +0.04 min
Participants increased engagement in moderate daily activity.
+2.43%
Raw change: +9.82 min
Longer overall sleep enabled more complete sleep cycles.
+1.34%
Raw change: +0.94 min
Supports physical repair, recovery, and hormone regulation.
+1.14%
Raw change: +1.05 min
Essential for cognition, memory, and emotion processing.
-2.04%
Raw change: 1.50 bpm
Lower minimum HR reflects deeper rest and recovery.
All testimonial videos were recorded with participant consent and have been stamped with Reputable Health’s verification badge.
These measures also changed during the study (direction shown below).
+0.16%
Share of time in bed spent asleep.
-0.21%
Slight reduction in sleeping breathing rate.
-1.19%
Less wake time at night improves sleep continuity.
-2.04%
Lower minimum HR reflects deeper rest and recovery.
-2.37%
Improved cardiovascular efficiency while sleeping.
-3.26%
Slight decrease in light sleep minutes during intervention.
-11.91%
Observed reduction in HRV during the study period.
A look at the diverse group of participants in the study.
Sleep duration improved (Total/Deep/REM), while heart-rate measures trended downward, indicating better nightly recovery.
Light Sleep decreased modestly, suggesting more time redistributed to restorative stages or natural night-to-night variability.
Targeted iterations (serving timing, satiety tweaks, flavor options) could reinforce adherence and outcomes in the next cohort.
| Area | Action | Rationale | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Satiety | Explore formula tweaks or guidance (fiber/fat add-ins) to improve fullness. | Multiple comments on being hungry post-shake. | High |
| Flavor & Texture | Offer additional flavors (e.g., chocolate) and reduce graininess. | Taste/texture feedback appeared frequently. | High |
| Timing Guidance | Provide suggested intake timing (e.g., morning vs. evening) based on goals. | Participants suggested timing might influence satiety and outcomes. | Medium |
Recommendations derived from participant comments and observed metrics.
Based on 22 of 25 participants who completed the post-study survey (88% completion).
5 of 22 participants
Mentions of helpful support and perceived benefits.
3 of 22 participants
No comments / general notes.
11 of 22 participants
Taste/texture (grainy), satiety, desire for more flavors.
3 of 22 participants
Participants did not provide a qualitative comment.
Approximate share based on manual coding of free-text responses.
Verified by Reputable Health
30-day wearable-powered study • 25 participants (22 completed, 88%)
| Medium Activity Minutes | +7.74% | +0.04 min |
| Total Sleep | +2.43% | +9.82 min |
| Deep Sleep | +1.34% | +0.94 min |
| REM Sleep | +1.14% | +1.05 min |
| Lowest HR (Sleep) | -2.04% | Lower minimum HR reflects deeper rest. |
| Sleep Efficiency | +0.16% | Share of time in bed spent asleep. |
| Respiratory Rate (Sleep) | -0.21% | Slight reduction in sleeping breathing rate. |
| Time Awake (Undisturbed ↑) | -1.19% | Less wake time at night improves continuity. |
| Average HR (Sleep) | -2.37% | Improved cardiovascular efficiency while sleeping. |
| Light Sleep | -3.26% | Slight decrease in light sleep minutes during intervention. |
| HRV | -11.91% | Observed reduction in HRV during the study period. |
| Area | Action | Rationale | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Satiety | Explore formula tweaks or guidance (fiber/fat add-ins) to improve fullness. | Multiple comments on being hungry post-shake. | High |
| Flavor & Texture | Offer additional flavors (e.g., chocolate) and reduce graininess. | Taste/texture feedback appeared frequently. | High |
| Timing Guidance | Provide suggested intake timing (e.g., morning vs. evening) based on goals. | Participants suggested timing might influence satiety and outcomes. | Medium |
Recommendations derived from participant comments and observed metrics.
Age: 36–45 (38%), 26–35 (22%), 56–65 (18%), 18–25 (10%), 46–55 (7%), 66+ (5%)
Gender: Female 83%, Male 17%
Location: United States (100%)
Based on 22 of 25 participants who completed the post-study survey (88% completion).
| Positive | ≈ 23% (5 of 22) | Helpful support and perceived benefits. |
| Neutral | ≈ 14% (3 of 22) | “No comments” / general notes. |
| Negative | ≈ 50% (11 of 22) | Taste/texture (grainy), satiety, desire for more flavors. |
| No Response | ≈ 14% (3 of 22) | Participants did not provide a qualitative comment. |
Approximate share based on manual coding of free-text responses.